June Matches: 03A3’s First Match, Garand and High Power

This was the last “home field” matches before Camp Perry so I booked the weekend full of matches.

Saturday morning was NRA High Power. It was a full house with a lot of people trying to get some trigger time before Perry.  Tropical Storm Bill had been predicted to doom the weekend’s matches but the weather held off. It was hot and muggy, perfect practice for Perry.

High Power Sitting

High Power Sitting

I beat my personal best on Saturday which felt great. I did reasonable in off hand which helped but I did a little above average for myself in slow and rapid which helped pull me up. I wasn’t really happy with sitting. This is the second match in a row I felt a little off in sitting, specifically bouncing around too much. Most of this boils down to rushing and loosing focus on trigger control. I’ll keep working on it.  “All i need to do ” is to pull off one more good match over the expert cut (89%) to move up to the Expert Classification. Maybe with a little luck I can make this happen soon.

Sunday I shot a Garand Match and a Springfield Match. The Garand Match was a little sloppy. I was “wildly inconsistent” in slow prone as my shooting partner described it. More times than I’d like to admit I bouced from the X to the 8 ring… and once to the 7. That and a mediocre rapid prone held me back a little. But I was able to do ok in off-hand to fall just 5 points under the medal cut. I would have felt better going into Perry with a high score but its within reach at this point.

Garand vs 03A3 in slow prone.

Garand vs 03A3 in slow prone.

On a later relay I brought the 03A3 out for its first Match. It has been a long project but it performed well all around. I had been apprehensive about rapid prone as in practice I had rushed myself into some ugly scores. However I was able to keep it together in rapid despite a dirty chamber and rough HXP causing some tough primary extraction issues. Between the fatigue, handling a new rifle, the heat, and rushing my shot, I dropped not one but TWO misses in off hand. Otherwise it was a good sting. Perhaps ironically, I was able to come in just 2 points under the medal cut, besting my performance with the Garand where I got all the rounds on target. So, I suppose “all I have to do” is not miss next time. Sounds easy right?

 

Watch me dance in rapid prone

CMP One Shot Dedication Match: Talladega Marksmanship Park

After a long morning of travel we rolled into CMP’s Talladega Marksmanship Park just after they wrapped up the dedication. It’s a very cool place, but more on that later.

20150605-150745-54465970.jpg

They were having a “one shot dedication match” which was one shot with one of several CMP specials. Whoever is closest to the X for the day wins a CMP special.

We later learned this was an “RSVPed guest only” event we had accidentally crashed, Whoops.

Regardless of our party crashing, It was a nice chance to check out the new targets. The real challenge is, that the rifle has an unknown zero. I took a guess that it was 6:00 based on a drawing someone had left behind at the bench and clicked it left one based on the shot of the last shooter which was a in the 8 ring at 3:00.

20150605-151306-54786697.jpg

Well my guess was wrong when it landed nice and neatly in the 8 ring, low and an inch too far left.

20150605-151600-54960865.jpg

The CMP special won’t be coming home with me, but it was nice to try out the fancy new equipment!

20150605-151657-55017305.jpg

20150605-152018-55218970.jpg

20150605-152017-55217723.jpg

The PU Mosin-Nagant Sniper

The PU sniper has been celebrated and degraded, referred to the best and most deadly by several internet “top 10 lists.” It has starred in video games, movies, and TV shows. Now,  I don’t know about best and most deadly, but GTB prefers the 1903A4. However, the Soviets had one of the best sniper programs in WW2. Rather than producing a special batch of rifles intended to be used as sniper rifles, 91/30s were pulled and tested for accuracy before leaving the factory. The most accurate ones were then set aside to be fitted with the PU scope. Generally the PU sniper has a better trigger and smoother action than the rearsenaled 91/30s common today.

The PU sniper scope, from which the PU sniper gets its name, was introduced in 1942 and had begun it’s life mainly on SVT-40 rifles. However, these rifles were found to be inaccurate and not desirable for use as a sniper rifle, due to the semi-automatic action. So the soviets began putting them on the 91/30 rifles.

This is a 1944 PU Sniper made at the Izhevsk Armory. It is equipped with a PU scope that was manufactured in 1943 from the Kazan Optical-Mechanical Factory (KOMZ). KOMZ made  4% of the total PU scope production for that year and only 7% of the total production.

IMG_2192
 

Each rifle was zeroed to it’s own scope and mount at the factory. To prevent a mix up, the scope mounts had the serial number of the rifle electro-penciled on them, and the rifles had the serial number of the scope stamped on the left side of the barrel shank.

After the war, most of these rifles were refurbished as all 91/30s were, and many were fitted with different scopes or mounts. So you may see a variation of crossed out and new numbers stamped or electro-penciled for the scopes and mounts, just as most other rifles that had been refurbished in Mother Russia.

IMG_2196
IMG_2194
 

One neat thing about this rifle, and I tried to capture a decent picture showing it, is the brown paint on the fore-end. Most of them did not survive with this paint. It is said that some snipers did this to cut down on glare. Whether it was for the glare on the scope or from their opposition, I’m not sure, but a cool part of this rifles history that still survives, none the less.

We are nearing the end of the golden era for these original WWII snipers. If you having been thinking about picking up a PU sniper, I would suggest buying one soon, while they are still very affordable. We have all seen the price increases across all WWII Rifles.

 

When shopping for a PU sniper, always do your homework. As with anything else, there are many counterfeits. Some of which were mass produced in the late 90’s through the 2000’s by Century Arms International, using scopes made made in the Ukraine in the 90’s. These reproduction scopes are not hard to spot, after you’ve seen one. The screws in the turret will be flush with the turret on a reproduction and the originals are have a domed head that sticks slightly above the scope turrets.

Another tell tale sign for a reproduction or post war mount is machine marks. The original wartime mounts will have very rough machining marks, as seen in my photos. Reproduction and post war mounts are very smooth and look well produced, since there was a need to expedite production, due to a war. Another tell tale sign of a reproduction, as silly as it sounds, is that the leather lens cap passes through the scope mount, so it can’t fall off of the rifle. Originals will just be placed over the lenses and can be removed from the rifle altogether.

One last big thing to remember is that PU production began in 1942. It is very highly unlikely that you will see any original PU with an earlier production year than 1942. If so, its very likely a reproduction. So read up, and get out there and pick one up, before they sky rocket in price like the other original WW2 snipers.

IMG_2193  IMG_2198 IMG_2197  IMG_2195

Content provided by a guest author.

Eastern Games “Pearl Harbor Six Digit” Service Grade: Initial Review and Range Report

As I mentioned in the last post, I picked up a nice 6 digit Springfield at the sales event at the CMP Eastern Games.

20150510-152053-55253511.jpg

I picked it from two six digits that I pulled off the table due to it’s nice barrel numbers on it’s 60s barrel, and a RIA stamped stock. Luckily a friend of mine who was “only going to buy a Garand if I find something nice” was just beside me at the table and was able to give the other six digit a good home.

I suspected it was a RIA rebuild based on the stock, however, after finishing my paper work and taking it down I learned it was a springfield rebuild (SA-64), which is still great, I really like 60s rebuilds. I have another Springfield rebuild, a Winchester Field grade, which has served me well as my match rifle over the past couple years.

This rifle has an interesting assortment of parts: a milled trigger guard in a Springfield tigger group, the RIA stock I first noticed, a late IHC bolt and Front sight, and a 60s era springfield op rod.

Since IHCs were post war and struggled a bit fulfilling their contract I am speculating Springfield armory was transferred some IHCs surplus parts after the contract expired. While I have no research to back this up that makes sense to me why so many IHC parts ended up in this rebuild.

Something particularly special to me about this rifle is that it falls in the serial range for Garands built in December 1941, the same month as Pearl Harbor, and the US declaring war on the Japanese and Germany. Based on some rough math this rifle was assembled in it’s original configuration just a week or so after Pearl Harbor. While no one will ever know what, if any, service this rifle saw, it was assembled during a very emotional time for a lot of people.

20150510-152212-55332078.jpg

Now to what really matters, the range report.

20150510-145659-53819238.jpg

Frankly I didn’t buy this rifle to be a shooter, which is a little out of character for me. As mentioned above I was looking for a six digit and I liked that it was a 60s rebuild. I took it out to the range get a rough zero and do a function test and I was pleasantly surprised. The CMP tag says ME = 1+ TE =2 which are pretty solid numbers. My gauge says it’s just under 2 which coincides with CMPs description.

After some haphazard chasing a single round to get a zero, it grouped very nicely with surplus HXP ammo.

20150510-150057-54057063.jpg

The trigger guard could use a peen job to tighten up the lugs and the stock needs some linseed oil, but this rifle turned out to be an “out of the box games match rifle” which was a very pleasant surprise. After Camp Perry I will take her to a local match and see what she can do.

   
              

K43: Hitler’s Garand

Nazi Germany struggled to develop a semi automatic battle rifle. During the ramp up to WWII it was seen as “too costly” to replace the K98k. By 1941 the Nazis had developed the Gewehr 41, a semi automatic 7.92x57mm rifle. Which, perhaps because of their lack of a “John C. Garand”, turned out to be unreliable.

The G41 was resigned to become the G43, working out the reliability issues that plagued the earlier model. The G43 was build from stamped steel as opposed to the milled G41 which made it quicker and cheaper to produce. In 1944 the G43 was renamed the K43.

Here an example of one of “Hitler’s Garands”. This is an AC45 “D” block rifle made in the Walther plant. The D block was a late war production which would have been made in late March or early April. Many of these late produced “D” block rifles were taken right from the racks in the Walther factory, as it was over run by the GIs on their way to Berlin.

20150324-210029-75629567.jpg

20150324-210028-75628357.jpg

Late war Walther rifles were made using a mix of parts that may have been out of spec/or earlier rejected parts, just to get rifles out of the door. This example has an earlier style bolt and retains its bolt locking tab. There is a mix of phosphate and blued parts, which is common in late war produced K43s. Also common in the very late produced rifles would be chatter marks on the stock, from running them through the mill with dull tooling, as they clearly didnt have the time to sharpen or change the knives in the mill. The chatter marks are very faint on this rifle (I believe it was sanded) but light enough to still retain the Waffenamts on the stock. Its very neat to see the crudeness of these K43s. Im always amazed at the milling and casting marks left on the bolt and the receiver. The Germans were really trying to crank these out, just a little to late.

20150324-211000-76200675.jpg

20150324-211002-76202042.jpg

20150324-211026-76226588.jpg

Many of these rifles were over gassed, especially the early ones, as they only had one small vent under the upper hand gaurd to bleed off the excess gas used to cycle the action. As a result, many of G/K43s will have the rear of the receiver actually bent out from being battered by the bolt. If ever looking at purchasing one of these rifles, that will be something you want to be certain to check for. As with any old gun, you want to make sure it has a decent set of springs in it before shooting it. For numbers matching guns, it is highly recommended to get a “shooter,s kit”, which replaces many of the commonly broken parts in G/K43s, so you don’t break any of your matching parts, and destroy the value of your rifle. They also have an adjustable gas system so you don’t batter your receiver.

This particular rifle took a trip to the “freezer match” this year which is a 40 round any rifle off hand match, and performed quite well.

20150324-212859-77339239.jpg

This article was contributed to by a guest author