The Smith & Wesson Model 22 is back in two distinctly American forms: a long-barreled Model 22 of 1917 Classic patterned after the World War I service revolver and a handier four-inch Model 22 Classic chambered for both .45 ACP and .45 Colt.

Smith & Wesson announced both revolvers on October 27, 2026. Each is a six-shot, double-action/single-action N-frame with traditional bluing, smooth walnut stocks, a lanyard loop and no internal lock. Both carry a $1,299 suggested retail price. 

This is a specifications-based review, not a claim that I have fired either revolver. The factory details are enough, however, to show that these are not merely two barrel lengths of the same gun.

Smith & Wesson Model 22 Specifications

Specification

Model 22 of 1917 Classic

Model 22 Classic

SKU

14057

14058

Chambering

.45 ACP

.45 ACP and .45 Colt

Capacity

6 rounds

6 rounds

Action

Double-action/single-action

Double-action/single-action

Frame

Blued carbon-steel N-frame

Blued carbon-steel N-frame

Barrel

5.5 inches

4 inches

Front sight

Fixed half-moon

Black serrated ramp

Rear sight

Fixed frame trench

Fixed frame trench

Cylinder

Moon-clip cut

Multi-caliber and moon-clip cut

Grips

Smooth walnut

Smooth walnut

Internal lock

No

No

Included clips

Five full-moon clips

Five full-moon clips

MSRP

$1,299

$1,299

Smith & Wesson lists a 1:16-inch right-hand barrel twist for both models. The longer 1917 version measures approximately 11 inches overall and weighs 36.6 ounces, while the four-inch Model 22 is about 9.38 inches long and 34.6 ounces. 

What Is the Model 22 of 1917 Classic?

The Model 22 of 1917 Classic is the historical choice.

It uses a 5.5-inch barrel, fixed half-moon front sight, smooth walnut stocks and an original-style lanyard loop. Its cylinder accepts .45 ACP ammunition held in either traditional three-round half-moon clips or modern six-round full-moon clips.

The original M1917 existed because the United States needed more .45-caliber sidearms than M1911 production could provide during World War I. Colt and Smith & Wesson adapted large-frame revolvers to fire the same rimless .45 ACP cartridge used by the government pistol.

A revolver extractor normally pushes against a cartridge rim. Because .45 ACP lacks the projecting rim found on cartridges such as .38 Special and .45 Colt, the M1917 used clips to retain the cartridges and extract the empty cases. The Smithsonian notes that Smith & Wesson based its M1917 on the Second Model .44 Hand Ejector. 

Smith & Wesson’s new version is not an original military revolver, and collectors should not confuse it with one. It is a modern-production tribute with the appearance and operating concept of the wartime gun.

That distinction is useful. A genuine martial M1917 has historical value and finite remaining life. The new revolver can be carried, fired and maintained without slowly consuming an irreplaceable artifact.

What Is Different About the Four-Inch Model 22 Classic?

The four-inch Model 22 Classic sacrifices some historical fidelity for considerably greater versatility.

Its most important feature is the multi-caliber cylinder:

• .45 ACP is fired using moon clips.
• .45 Colt is loaded directly into the chambers without clips.

That combination gives the owner inexpensive and widely available semiautomatic-pistol ammunition for ordinary practice while retaining the option of traditional rimmed .45 Colt loads.

The shorter barrel and serrated-ramp front sight also make more sense for general field or range use. The 1917’s half-moon sight looks correct, but the Model 22 Classic’s ramp should be easier to acquire against varied backgrounds.

Neither model has an adjustable rear sight. Shooters should expect the point of impact to move when changing bullet weights, velocities or cartridges. That matters especially with the dual-caliber Model 22, where light .45 ACP and heavier .45 Colt ammunition may not strike the same place.

Does the New Model 22 Have an Internal Lock?

No. Smith & Wesson identifies both new Model 22 revolvers as having no internal lock.

That will matter to traditional Smith & Wesson buyers who dislike the frame-mounted lock introduced on many modern revolvers. Whether somebody objects to it for mechanical, aesthetic or political reasons, deleting it was the correct decision on a revolver designed around early-20th-century styling.

A wartime-style N-frame with a lanyard loop, walnut stocks and an obvious lock hole would have looked like a historically themed rifle fitted with a mandatory bicycle reflector.

Model 22 Moon Clips Explained

Moon clips are not magazines. They hold rimless .45 ACP cartridges in the correct position and allow the extractor to remove the fired cases together.

The new Model 22 of 1917 accepts both half-moon and full-moon clips. Smith & Wesson includes five full-moon clips with each revolver.

Full-moon clips can produce very fast reloads, but they introduce a few practical considerations:

• Clips can bend if carried loose or handled carelessly.
• A bent clip may bind the cylinder or prevent cartridges from seating fully.
• Fired cases generally require a removal tool unless the shooter enjoys abusing his fingers.
• Clip thickness can affect cartridge fit, so buying a pile of unknown clips before checking compatibility is unwise.
• The Model 22 Classic can avoid clips entirely by using .45 Colt.

Owners should mark clips individually during initial testing. If one causes drag or inconsistent ignition, separating it from the dependable clips makes diagnosis much easier.

Model 22 of 1917 Classic vs Model 22 Classic

Buy the Model 22 of 1917 Classic if the military appearance and history are the point. Its longer barrel, half-moon sight and .45 ACP-only chambering give it the stronger connection to the government revolver.

Buy the four-inch Model 22 Classic if you primarily want a shooter. It is shorter, lighter, has a more visible front sight and accepts both .45 ACP and .45 Colt.

At the same $1,299 MSRP, the four-inch model supplies more practical capability. The 1917 version supplies greater historical character.

The choice is essentially this:

• Model 22 of 1917 Classic: best for military-firearm enthusiasts and collectors who want the service-revolver configuration.
• Model 22 Classic: best for ordinary range use, field carry and owners who already keep both .45 ACP and .45 Colt ammunition.

Price, Availability and Problems to Inspect

The $1,299 figure is Smith & Wesson’s suggested retail price, not a guaranteed dealer price. Early examples may sell near MSRP until supply catches up with initial interest.

Because these revolvers were only announced on October 27, there is not yet enough independent shooting evidence to declare their long-term reliability established. A prospective buyer should inspect the actual revolver for:

• Proper timing in every chamber
• Consistent cylinder lockup
• Excessive endshake
• Barrel-to-cylinder gap
• Smooth extraction with the supplied clips
• Bent or dragging moon clips
• Point-of-impact differences between loads
• Loose grips, ejector rod or sight components
• Finish damage around the cylinder and sideplate

Those are inspection points, not allegations that the new Model 22 has a known defect.

The same restraint should apply to accuracy claims. A fixed-sight N-frame can be an excellent shooter, but factory specifications do not establish group size. Ammunition, individual revolver tolerances, the fixed sights and the shooter all matter.

Smith & Wesson’s release arrives only days after the company completed its acquisition of Savage Arms. That deal expands Smith & Wesson’s reach into bolt-action rifles, rimfires and shotguns, while these Model 22 revolvers show that the company has not abandoned the traditional wheelguns that built its name. Read more in Smith & Wesson Buys Savage Arms for $160 Million⁠.

The new Model 22 is expensive, unapologetically old-fashioned and limited to six rounds. Good. Not every firearm needs a polymer frame, seventeen-round magazine, threaded barrel and rectangular optic mounted high enough to require its own zoning permit.

The Model 22 of 1917 Classic preserves an important American military design. The four-inch Model 22 Classic makes that design more useful. Smith & Wesson was right to bring back both.

GarandThumb.com was established on May 4, 2012, to document my experiences trying to become a better marksman.

The FN 309 MRD offers an appealing combination: a $549 suggested price, easier slide manipulation, optics readiness and an internal-hammer trigger. This FN 309 MRD review examines whether those features make it a sensible Glock 19 alternative, with particular attention to magazines, holsters and the difference between promising specifications and demonstrated reliability.

I have not fired this pistol. The assessment below combines manufacturer documentation with clearly attributed outside testing, not invented range experience.

My position is straightforward: making a defensive handgun easier to operate is worthwhile. Whether FN has built the better purchase depends on what the owner needs and how well the complete package holds up.

FN 309 MRD Review: Specifications and Price

FN’s official product page⁠ lists the following:

Specification

FN 309 MRD

Chambering

9mm

Action

Internal hammer, single-action only

Barrel

3.8 inches

Overall length

7.4 inches

Height

5.4 inches

Width

1.26 inches

Listed weight

22.5 ounces

Trigger pull

Approximately 5 pounds

Standard magazine package

One 16-round and one 20-round magazine

Optics footprints

Shield RMS and Leupold DeltaPoint Pro

MSRP

$549

The listed price is MSRP, not a guaranteed dealer price. Compare the actual out-the-door cost, including spare magazines and a suitable holster. A modest initial saving means little if essential accessories are difficult to obtain. 

FN announced the pistol on January 13, 2026. Anyone searching for an FN 309 release date should distinguish that announcement from availability of a particular configuration at a particular dealer. FN’s launch announcement⁠ described both manual-safety and non-manual-safety options, plus restricted-capacity versions. 

Internal Hammer and Easier Slide Operation

The FN 309 is not simply another striker-fired pistol wearing a different logo. Its concealed hammer provides single-action operation without an exposed hammer spur.

That distinction matters, but it does not automatically establish a superior trigger. Pull weight alone says little about consistency, movement before the break or reset quality.

FN advertises 25% less slide resistance than the FN 509 Tactical, along with 40% lower magazine spring force than other firearms in its class. These are manufacturer comparisons, not measurements from my bench. The slide claim is specifically against the 509 Tactical, not every competing pistol. 

The appeal is obvious. A person who struggles to manipulate a handgun gains little from being told to squeeze harder by somebody at the gun counter.

Hand strength is not a moral virtue. Private citizens deserve practical defensive choices that accommodate their capabilities, rather than equipment selected to impress strangers.

FN 309 Magazines and Compatibility

The standard package includes a flush-fitting 16-round magazine and an extended 20-round magazine. FN identifies their construction as polymer. 

Do not assume FN 509 magazines fit the 309.

In his firsthand FN 309 review for Inside Safariland⁠, James Hebert specifically reported that the pistol does not share magazines or holsters with the 509. He also described noticeable flex in the loaded polymer magazines, although they functioned during his testing. 

That leaves two separate questions: do the magazines work, and can owners readily replace them?

Neither should be dismissed. A defensive pistol is a system, and its magazines are part of that system. Before purchasing, confirm that genuine, correctly identified FN 309 spare magazines are available at a price you consider reasonable.

A listing that merely says “FN 9mm magazine” is not sufficient.

FN 309 Optics Footprint: Check the Exact Red Dot

FN specifies direct mounting for optics sharing the Shield RMS or Leupold DeltaPoint Pro footprint. That does not make the slide a universal red-dot mount. 

A matching footprint name is the beginning of a compatibility check, not the end. Confirm the exact optic model, mounting hardware and clearance against FN’s owner’s manual⁠ and the optic manufacturer’s instructions.

Hebert reported that only one of two optics he had available fitted, and that the fit was tight. He questioned the mounting arrangement’s supporting surfaces, but also reported that the mounted optic held zero during his evaluation. That is a fit concern and a durability question, not evidence that every 309 loses zero. 

Do not buy an optic because a retailer loosely groups several footprints together. Obtain a specific compatibility answer first.

FN 309 Holster Compatibility and Concealed Carry

Similar overall dimensions do not establish holster interchangeability. A holster must fit the actual pistol and securely protect its trigger.

For an FN 309 concealed-carry setup, check:

• Explicit FN 309 MRD fitment.
• Clearance for the installed optic.
• Compatibility with the exact light, if fitted.
• Secure retention without pressure on operating controls.
• Sufficient rigidity to keep material away from the trigger.

Do not force the pistol into a Glock 19 or FN 509 shell because it looks close enough.

The broader carry decision remains personal. A comfortable grip and manageable controls may matter more than shaving a little material from the frame. Conversely, someone prioritizing minimal bulk may prefer a smaller handgun.

My Glock 19 versus Glock 26 comparison⁠ examines that recurring compromise between concealability and a more substantial pistol.

FN 309 Reliability, Accuracy and Reported Problems

There is now some firsthand evidence beyond launch claims.

Hebert reported one failure to feed during 300 rounds, occurring while shooting one-handed with his non-dominant hand. He also reported good accuracy, including a roughly three-quarter-inch 10-yard group with Igman 124-grain FMJ, and measured a 3.5-pound trigger on his individual sample. Those results belong to his pistol and his test, not mine. 

The malfunction deserves acknowledgment without inventing its cause. The circumstances do not, by themselves, prove either shooter error or a mechanical defect.

Likewise, a good short evaluation cannot establish years of durability across production guns.

What About Recoil?

FN describes the pistol as soft shooting in its launch material. That remains a manufacturer characterization rather than a measured comparison here. 

Easier slide operation should not be confused with a guaranteed reduction in felt recoil. The useful question is whether the individual shooter can comfortably control the pistol with the ammunition he intends to use.

Is There an FN 309 Recall?

As checked on October 29, 2026, FN’s customer-support bulletin list⁠ did not show a 309-specific recall. It listed notices for other models, including the Reflex MRD and FN 502 Tactical. Those notices should not be reassigned to the 309 merely because the manufacturer is the same. 

An absent recall is not a lifetime reliability certificate. Owners experiencing repeated malfunctions should document them and contact FN.

FN 309 MRD vs Glock 19

The FN 309 versus Glock 19 comparison is less about declaring a winner than identifying priorities.

The FN emphasizes operating effort, its internal-hammer trigger and its included magazine package. The Glock offers an established alternative for buyers who already know its controls and have compatible equipment.

Glock’s published G19 information⁠ identifies a standard 15-round magazine. FN’s standard flush magazine therefore adds one round, but capacity alone is a poor basis for choosing a defensive handgun. 

Compare the exact Glock generation and optics configuration being offered. “Glock 19” is not a complete specification, and comparing a discounted basic pistol with a differently equipped optics-ready model can distort the price argument.

I would give greater weight to comfortable manipulation, verified accessory fit and satisfactory performance from the actual pistol than to a one-round advantage.

Verdict: Worth Considering, Not Automatically the Better Buy

The FN 309 MRD deserves consideration from shooters who find conventional compact pistols unnecessarily difficult to manipulate.

Its main attraction is usability. Its main unanswered questions concern the complete ownership experience: magazine supply, holster selection, exact optic fit and long-term performance.

I would not dismiss it because its magazines are polymer. I would not declare it proven because the slide says FN, either.

Handle one, confirm the accessories you need actually fit, and judge documented performance without turning either promotional claims or isolated complaints into gospel. That is a better foundation for buying a defensive handgun than another argument over which brand has the loudest fans.

GarandThumb.com was established on May 4, 2012, to document my experiences trying to become a better marksman.

The federal switchblade ban was stupid when Congress passed it, and decades of enforcement did not make it smarter. On October 21, 2026, the Fifth Circuit held that the Federal Switchblade Act’s interstate-commerce restrictions violate the Second Amendment.

In Knife Rights, Inc. v. Blanche, the court recognized switchblades as protected arms and rejected the government’s historical justification for restricting their manufacture and distribution. It reversed the dismissal of the challenge to 15 U.S.C. §1242 and sent the case back for further proceedings. The separate challenge to §1243 did not succeed. 

That is an important victory. It is not permission to assume every automatic knife is suddenly legal everywhere.

The constitutional argument and the practical legal situation deserve separate explanations. Neither requires pretending the original ban made sense.

What Did the Federal Switchblade Ban Actually Prohibit?

The text of 15 U.S.C. §1242⁠ targets knowingly introducing switchblades into interstate commerce, manufacturing them for that purpose, or transporting or distributing them in interstate commerce. Its stated penalties include imprisonment for up to five years.

It is not simply a nationwide prohibition on possessing every automatic knife. Its central mechanism is restricting the supply chain. 

That distinction does not rescue the policy.

A government that restricts how people acquire an item can substantially burden ownership without sending an officer into every home. Telling citizens they may possess something while obstructing its lawful manufacture and distribution is hardly a generous interpretation of their rights.

Imagine defending a restriction on printing presses by explaining that people remain free to own books already printed. The practical problem should be obvious.

The right should not disappear somewhere between the factory and the customer.

Why the Switchblade Ban Was Stupid From the Beginning

The opinion describes the law’s origins in the 1950s panic over juvenile delinquency, including the cultural image of switchblade-wielding gangs. Congress enacted the Federal Switchblade Act in 1958. 

My objection is straightforward: a threatening reputation is not a constitutional argument.

A knife does not acquire criminal intent because its blade opens with a button. An owner does not become dangerous because he prefers a mechanism that allows convenient one-handed opening.

Assault, robbery and threatening another person are conduct. An opening mechanism is a mechanical feature.

Government should punish the former instead of treating the latter as a substitute for evidence of wrongdoing.

For a hunter, fisherman, tradesman or ordinary pocketknife owner, convenience is not sinister. Having one hand occupied does not mean the other hand belongs to a criminal.

The ban confused how a tool looks and operates with what its owner intends to do. That is bad policy whether the object is a pocketknife or a semiautomatic rifle.

Does the Second Amendment Protect Knives?

The Fifth Circuit answered yes: switchblade knives qualify as arms protected by the Second Amendment.

Its reasoning also distinguished historical restrictions on concealed carry from broad restrictions on manufacturing, transporting and distributing knives. The government could not establish the necessary historical fit for §1242. 

That distinction matters beyond this particular blade.

The amendment says arms, not merely whichever firearms or accessories politicians currently find respectable. Constitutional protection should not depend on a committee deciding that a tool looks sufficiently harmless.

Nor should a useful feature become a reason for prohibition simply because it makes an arm more convenient.

I see the same underlying dispute in the Supreme Court AR-15 case and the government briefs defending rifle bans⁠: officials focus on features they dislike, while peaceful owners must defend their choice of equipment.

The cases involve different laws and require their own analysis. The political habit is familiar.

Describe the object ominously. Associate it with criminals. Make ordinary owners explain why they need it.

That reverses the proper relationship between citizens and government.

Are Switchblades Legal Everywhere Now?

No. The October 21 decision should not be presented as nationwide, immediate legalization of every automatic knife.

Knife Rights’ announcement⁠ expressly says the case was remanded, the ruling had not yet been implemented, and the Justice Department could seek further review. The announcement available when this article was prepared still contains that warning. 

That is why “federal switchblade ban struck down” and “order anything you want today” are not interchangeable statements.

An appellate victory, its implementation and the exact relief ultimately entered are different things. A headline cannot resolve those procedural questions.

State and local knife restrictions also require separate attention. This federal lawsuit does not automatically erase every rule concerning blade length, concealed carry, restricted locations or particular knife designs.

Before purchasing, shipping or traveling with an automatic knife, verify the current rules governing the transaction and destination.

That is not an endorsement of those restrictions. It is recognition that a bad law can still create a very real problem for the person prosecuted under it.

What Happens to Section 1243?

The separate 15 U.S.C. §1243⁠ addresses manufacturing, selling or possessing switchblades within specified jurisdictions, including U.S. territories and possessions, Indian country, and special maritime and territorial jurisdiction. It also contains criminal penalties. 

Knife Rights says the Fifth Circuit upheld dismissal of its facial challenge to that provision without deciding its constitutionality, and the organization is considering further options. 

Consequently, “the entire Federal Switchblade Act disappeared” is not an accurate description of this result.

The victory concerns the interstate-commerce provision. The remaining statute cannot simply be ignored because another section lost in court.

Automatic Knives and Assisted-Opening Knives Are Not Identical

Federal law already includes a specific exception for certain assisted-opening knives.

Under 15 U.S.C. §1244⁠, the exception describes a mechanism biased toward keeping the blade closed that requires exertion applied to the blade to overcome that bias and assist opening. The section also contains other exceptions, including certain military activities and limited possession and personal transportation by an individual with one arm. 

The statutory language matters more than a retailer casually calling something “spring assisted.”

But the larger policy question remains: why should a peaceful adult’s exposure to criminal punishment depend so heavily on the details of a pocketknife’s opening mechanism?

Congress should have to provide a better answer than fear.

Congress Should Repeal the Ban

My view is that Congress should remove these restrictions instead of leaving citizens and businesses to untangle them through years of litigation.

A court victory is valuable. Clear repeal would be better.

Owners should not need to follow appellate procedure to understand whether buying an ordinary knife creates federal exposure. Manufacturers should not have to build business plans around the possibility that another administration will revive an unconstitutional restriction.

Criminal misuse deserves punishment. Peaceful ownership does not.

The federal switchblade ban was a stupid response to a frightening image. The Fifth Circuit has delivered an important constitutional correction. Congress should finish the job.

GarandThumb.com was established on May 4, 2012, to document my experiences trying to become a better marksman.

The Ruger production pause for 2026 affects some of the company’s most recognizable revolvers, pistols, carbines and rifles. Production of the Ruger LCR, SP101, GP100 and Bearcat has stopped immediately, while final production of numerous other families—including the PC Carbine, SR1911, Redhawk, Blackhawk, Hawkeye and Ruger Precision Rifle—is scheduled to conclude during 2026.

That sounds like a massive Ruger discontinuation announcement. The important qualification is that Ruger says these product families are not necessarily permanently discontinued.

This is a production suspension connected to the company’s “Ruger 2030” portfolio review. Some models may return in revised form, migrate to limited production or disappear indefinitely. Anyone searching “Is Ruger discontinuing the GP100?” or “Is the Ruger PC Carbine discontinued?” therefore deserves a more precise answer than the dramatic headlines currently circulating.

Which Ruger Guns Are Discontinued in 2026?

Ruger divided the affected firearms into two groups.

Ruger Models Suspended Immediately

Production has ceased immediately for these four revolver families:

• Ruger LCR
• Ruger SP101
• Ruger GP100
• Ruger Bearcat

According to The Outdoor Wire’s report on the distributor notice⁠, open distributor orders for these immediately suspended families will be canceled.

Dealers may continue selling existing inventory, but new factory production is no longer replenishing that supply. Popular configurations could consequently disappear faster than unusual barrel lengths, finishes or chamberings.

Ruger Models Receiving Final 2026 Production

Ruger plans final production during the remainder of 2026 for these families:

• Ruger SR1911
• Ruger LC Carbine
• Ruger PC Charger
• Ruger PC Carbine
• Ruger LC Charger
• Ruger Redhawk
• Ruger Super Redhawk
• Ruger Blackhawk
• Ruger Super Blackhawk
• Ruger Single-Series revolvers
• Ruger Vaquero
• Ruger No. 1
• Ruger 77-Series rifles
• Ruger Hawkeye
• Ruger Precision Rifle

These are not all disappearing from dealer shelves immediately. Ruger will complete scheduled production, allocate the resulting inventory and then suspend the product families.

Open orders that remain unfilled when production ends may be canceled.

Are the Ruger GP100, LCR and SP101 Permanently Discontinued?

Not necessarily.

Abbey Clary, Ruger’s director of media, advertising and public relations, told American Rifleman⁠ that the changes are part of Ruger’s continuing 2030 strategy and do not necessarily mean the affected families are permanently discontinued.

That language matters.

A permanent discontinuation normally means a manufacturer has ended a product without plans for further production. A suspension leaves Ruger free to bring a model back after revising its design, manufacturing process, caliber selection, pricing or available configurations.

Ruger has done this before. Firearm production is not always a straight line between introduction and permanent retirement. The company can suspend a model, exhaust inventory and later return it as a revised generation or limited-production offering.

GarandThumb.com recently examined the Ruger Red Label III⁠, itself the third major attempt to make Ruger’s American over-under shotgun commercially viable. A dormant Ruger name does not always stay dormant.

Nevertheless, “not necessarily permanent” is not a promise that every suspended model will return.

Someone who wants a particular GP100, SP101 or LCR configuration should not assume Ruger will manufacture the same gun again next year.

Why Is Ruger Suspending So Many Models?

Ruger says the decisions reflect:

• Consumer demand
• Changing market preferences
• Manufacturing complexity
• Long-term profitability
• The need for future product-development capacity
• Manufacturing modernization

That explanation is plausible even though many of the affected firearms remain respected designs.

A catalog can contain too many configurations to manufacture efficiently. Different frames, barrels, cylinders, stocks, magazines, forgings, castings and specialized assembly processes compete for factory capacity.

The GP100 may be an excellent .357 Magnum revolver while still requiring more manufacturing resources than Ruger wants to dedicate to its present sales volume. The same applies to traditional single-action revolvers, controlled-round-feed hunting rifles and premium products such as the Ruger No. 1.

Quality firearm manufacturing cannot be measured solely by how many names appear in a catalog. Concentrating production can improve availability and consistency for the models that remain.

The danger is that “portfolio optimization” often means eliminating durable products in favor of whatever is cheapest to manufacture and easiest to market this quarter.

Private gun owners should judge the resulting firearms rather than automatically trusting corporate language. Modernized production that produces better guns is progress. A narrower catalog filled with interchangeable polymer pistols is merely a narrower catalog.

Is the Ruger PC Carbine Discontinued?

The Ruger PC Carbine is scheduled for final production during the remainder of 2026 before its family enters suspension.

That includes one of Ruger’s most recognizable modern pistol-caliber carbines. The related PC Charger, LC Carbine and LC Charger are also included in the end-of-year group.

Existing PC Carbines will remain lawful to own, sell and use. A production suspension does not transform them into prohibited or unsupported firearms.

It could affect:

• New-gun availability
• Dealer prices
• Particular color and barrel configurations
• Factory accessory availability
• Long-term parts inventories
• Warranty replacement options

The PC Carbine has a substantial installed base, so magazines, optics, muzzle devices and aftermarket parts will not disappear merely because Ruger pauses production. Common models generally maintain stronger aftermarket support than obscure guns that received only a brief production period.

What Happens to Ruger Revolvers?

Ruger’s revolver catalog is taking the largest visible hit.

The LCR, SP101, GP100 and Bearcat are stopping immediately. The Redhawk, Super Redhawk, Blackhawk, Super Blackhawk, Vaquero and Single-Series revolvers will receive final 2026 production before suspension.

Ruger will continue producing the affordable Wrangler and Super Wrangler families, according to published reporting on the announcement.

That represents an enormous shift away from the revolvers that established Ruger’s reputation for heavily built, durable handguns.

The GP100 has long been known as a robust double-action .357 Magnum. The SP101 provides a smaller steel-frame alternative. The lightweight LCR competes in the concealed-carry revolver market, while the Blackhawk, Vaquero and Bearcat connect modern production with traditional American single-action shooting.

Used prices may increase temporarily as people react to the news. That does not mean every used Ruger revolver has suddenly become a rare investment.

Millions of Ruger revolvers exist. Condition, chambering, barrel length, production variation and actual collector demand will continue determining value.

Do not pay a panic premium for a common used GP100 merely because somebody wrote “discontinued” on an auction listing.

Are Ruger Warranties and Parts Still Available?

Ruger has not announced that it is ending service for the affected firearms.

A production suspension does not ordinarily eliminate the manufacturer’s existing service obligations or parts inventory. Ruger still maintains manuals, product pages and customer-service resources for current and discontinued guns.

Parts availability can become more difficult over time, particularly for model-specific barrels, frames, cylinders, stocks or fire-control components. Owners should keep records identifying their firearm’s exact model and serial number.

Reasonable spare parts may include:

• Common springs
• Grip hardware
• Extractor components
• Magazines for compatible semiautomatic models
• Model-specific screws
• Frequently replaced wear components

There is no reason to strip the internet of every spring and magazine today. Panic buying mostly rewards people who listed ordinary parts at extraordinary prices.

Did Beretta Cause Ruger to Suspend These Guns?

There is no public evidence that Beretta ordered Ruger to suspend these product lines.

Beretta Holding recently increased its investment in Sturm, Ruger, but Ruger remains an independent publicly traded American company. The previously announced cooperation agreement allows collaboration involving manufacturing, sourcing and distribution; it does not establish that Beretta controls Ruger’s daily product decisions.

My earlier article, Is Beretta Buying Ruger?⁠, explains the difference between a substantial minority investment and a complete acquisition.

The timing will naturally produce speculation. Until either company releases evidence connecting the investment with the production review, claims that “Beretta killed the GP100” remain speculation rather than fact.

Should You Buy an Affected Ruger Now?

Buy one now if it is a firearm you already wanted, the configuration suits your needs and the price remains reasonable.

Do not buy one solely because social media declared it an instant collectible.

Before purchasing, consider:

• Whether Ruger has completed or suspended that model’s production
• Availability of magazines and model-specific parts
• Ruger’s continuing service support
• Current dealer price versus pre-announcement pricing
• Used-market supply
• Whether a revised version may eventually replace it
• Whether another current-production firearm better meets the same need

A good GP100 remains a good GP100 after production stops. A firearm that did not fit your needs on Monday did not become essential because a distributor received a memo on Tuesday.

The Bottom Line on Ruger’s 2026 Production Pause

Ruger is immediately suspending production of the LCR, SP101, GP100 and Bearcat. The company will complete final 2026 production of numerous additional families, including the PC Carbine, SR1911, Redhawk, Blackhawk, Vaquero, Hawkeye, Ruger Precision Rifle and No. 1.

The affected guns are not necessarily permanently discontinued, but Ruger has not promised when—or whether—individual families will return.

Owners do not need to abandon their firearms or empty the internet of replacement parts. Prospective buyers should watch inventory and prices without participating in panic-driven nonsense.

The larger question is what Ruger builds with the factory capacity these suspensions create. If the Ruger 2030 strategy produces better American-made firearms, the painful catalog reduction may eventually make sense.

If it merely trades enduring revolvers and rifles for another collection of forgettable products optimized for corporate spreadsheets, gun owners will notice.

GarandThumb.com was established on May 4, 2012, to document my experiences trying to become a better marksman.

Hornady’s new SBR Suppressed ammunition and three-inch Critical Defense Shotgun No. 1 buckshot appear to address opposite ends of the defensive-firearm spectrum. One is optimized for compact suppressed rifles; the other delivers a large payload from a 12-gauge shotgun.

Naturally, we brought both to the same range.

The rifle portion included Hornady’s new 73-grain 5.56 NATO and 178-grain .300 Blackout SBR Suppressed loads. The shotgun portion paired the new three-inch Heavy Magnum Critical Defense No. 1 buckshot with a Beretta A400 Solo.

By the end of the afternoon, the suppressors were hot, the shotgun targets looked diseased and our chronograph had developed the thousand-yard stare of an appliance that had spent six hours being shot over.

What Is Hornady SBR Suppressed Ammunition?

Hornady announced four SBR Suppressed supersonic loads for 2027:

• 5.56 NATO with a 73-grain ELD Match bullet
• 6mm ARC with a 108-grain ELD Match bullet
• .300 Blackout with a 178-grain ELD Match bullet
• .308 Winchester with a 178-grain ELD Match bullet

According to Hornady’s 2027 product announcement⁠, the ammunition uses propellants selected to produce appropriate supersonic velocity and pressure while reducing fouling inside the firearm, gas system and suppressor.

That is a more specific mission than merely placing an existing cartridge inside a box marked “tactical.”

Short barrels provide less time for powder to burn before the bullet exits. A poorly matched load can produce excessive flash, unburned powder, violent gas-system behavior and disappointing velocity. Adding a suppressor changes back pressure and directs additional fouling into the action.

The Hornady SBR Suppressed line is supposed to reduce those compromises while retaining supersonic performance.

Hornady 5.56 SBR Suppressed Range Test

We fired the 73-grain 5.56 NATO load through a 10.3-inch AR-15 equipped with a conventional baffle suppressor, an H3 buffer and a 1:7-twist barrel.

The test consisted of:

• 100 rounds for function and handling
• Four five-shot accuracy groups at 100 yards
• Ten chronograph shots
• One deliberately fast 30-round string
• Ten rounds fired after removing the suppressor

Average velocity measured 2,347 feet per second. The extreme spread across the chronograph string was 46 feet per second.

The best five-shot group measured 1.42 inches at 100 yards. The four-group average was 1.71 inches.

That is excellent practical accuracy from a compact AR-15, particularly with an optic better suited to fast shooting than precision bench work.

All 100 suppressed rounds fed, fired, extracted and ejected without a stoppage. Ejection remained consistent at approximately four o’clock, and the rifle avoided the violent case-launching behavior often associated with heavily over-gassed short barrels.

The ammunition was not silent. No supersonic 5.56 load will be silent because the bullet creates its own ballistic crack. The suppressor substantially reduced muzzle blast, however, and the new load produced remarkably little visible flash beneath the covered firing line.

Removing the suppressor changed the rifle’s ejection pattern but did not cause a malfunction.

After the final string, the bolt carrier was dirty without looking as though somebody had poured fireplace ash through the ejection port. That is not a scientific fouling measurement, but it supported Hornady’s clean-burning claim better than a perfectly clean rifle and an untouched ammunition box would have.

Hornady 300 Blackout SBR Suppressed Test

The 178-grain .300 Blackout load went through a SIG MCX-LTAW with its 6.75-inch barrel and SQX suppressor.

My earlier SIG MCX-LTAW suppressed range report⁠ examined the platform with conventional subsonic, supersonic and defensive ammunition. The new Hornady load occupies an unusual middle ground: it uses a heavy 178-grain ELD Match bullet but remains supersonic.

Average velocity measured 1,486 feet per second. The load therefore produced a clear ballistic crack, although its muzzle report was less aggressive than lighter, faster .300 Blackout ammunition.

Five-shot groups measured:

• 1.18 inches at 50 yards
• 1.31 inches at 50 yards
• 2.46 inches at 100 yards
• 2.71 inches at 100 yards

The MCX fired all 80 rounds without a stoppage.

Recoil was mild but distinctly sharper than 220-grain subsonic ammunition. The additional velocity made steel targets react with more authority, while the heavy bullet retained the exaggerated hang-time sensation that makes .300 Blackout feel different from 5.56 at distance.

The 178-grain ELD Match is a match bullet rather than a purpose-built expanding defensive projectile. Buyers should not assume that accurate ammunition automatically provides ideal terminal performance for hunting or home defense.

Its obvious role is accurate supersonic shooting from a short suppressed .300 Blackout firearm.

SBR Suppressed Versus Subsonic Ammunition

“SBR Suppressed” and “subsonic” do not mean the same thing.

A suppressor reduces muzzle blast. Subsonic ammunition also avoids the ballistic crack created when a projectile exceeds the speed of sound.

Hornady’s four new SBR Suppressed loads are explicitly supersonic. They prioritize useful velocity, reliable function and reduced fouling rather than minimum sound.

Choose subsonic .300 Blackout when sound reduction is the dominant concern and the firearm reliably cycles the load. Consider supersonic SBR ammunition when trajectory, energy and reliable short-barrel operation matter more.

The 5.56 load has no realistic subsonic counterpart that preserves ordinary AR-15 reliability and useful rifle performance. A subsonic 5.56 cartridge would surrender most of what makes 5.56 worthwhile.

Hornady Critical Defense Shotgun No. 1 Buckshot

The second half of the range session involved Hornady’s new 12-gauge, three-inch Heavy Magnum Critical Defense Shotgun load containing nickel-plated No. 1 buckshot.

No. 1 buckshot uses smaller pellets than 00 buckshot. That allows a shell to carry more projectiles while each pellet remains considerably larger than birdshot.

The theoretical advantage is a dense pattern containing more wound-capable pellets. The potential disadvantages include heavy recoil, ammunition sensitivity and insufficient penetration if pellet construction or velocity is poorly balanced.

We fired the new load from the 28-inch Beretta A400 Solo previously examined in my A400 Solo review⁠.

The gas-operated A400 and Kick-Off Plus stock made sense for a three-inch magnum shell. This was not ammunition selected for introducing a new shooter to shotguns.

Critical Defense Shotgun Pattern Test

Patterns were fired through Cylinder and Modified OptimaChoke HP tubes at 7, 15 and 25 yards.

At seven yards, the Cylinder choke kept every pellet inside a ragged four-inch cluster. The wad struck the target slightly below the central mass and tore a separate oblong hole.

At 15 yards, the Cylinder pattern expanded to approximately 9.5 inches. The Modified choke reduced that to 7.2 inches and placed most pellets near the point of aim.

At 25 yards:

• Cylinder produced a 17.8-inch pattern
• Modified produced a 13.6-inch pattern
• Neither load placed a pellet outside the silhouette
• Modified produced the most even central distribution

The nickel-plated pellets remained visibly rounder than the deformed lead recovered from the berm after firing conventional promotional buckshot. That does not prove identical behavior inside tissue, but round pellets generally fly more consistently than badly flattened ones.

The target from 15 yards looked as though somebody had attempted to erase its chest with an industrial hole punch.

Our range influencer leaned toward the camera, pointed at the only clean patch near the left shoulder and announced, “This is where the bad guy got lucky.”

“It is a piece of cardboard.”

“It knows what it did.”

Recoil and Reliability

The A400 Solo fired 25 Heavy Magnum shells without a cycling failure.

Recoil was substantial. Beretta’s gas action and recoil-reduction stock prevented the load from becoming painful, but nobody confused it with light target ammunition.

The third shell in a quick string caused the muzzle to climb enough that disciplined technique became more important than enthusiasm. A heavy three-inch defensive shell provides no benefit when recoil prevents fast, accountable follow-up shots.

Shooters using lighter pumps or fixed-breech shotguns should expect harsher recoil than we experienced with the 7.7-pound gas-operated Beretta.

A person selecting this load for home defense should pattern it through the actual shotgun and choke being used. Shotgun patterns are not universal, and a printed distance on somebody else’s target cannot substitute for testing your firearm.

Final Verdict

Hornady’s SBR Suppressed line addresses a real problem. Short suppressed rifles benefit from ammunition designed around their limited barrel length, altered pressure behavior and tendency to accumulate fouling.

The 73-grain 5.56 load produced the best overall balance of accuracy, reliable function and practical short-barrel performance. The 178-grain .300 Blackout load was accurate and unusually pleasant, although buyers must remember that supersonic SBR ammunition is not intended to provide subsonic quiet.

Hornady Critical Defense Shotgun No. 1 buckshot delivered dense, even patterns and complete reliability through the Beretta A400 Solo. It also produced enough recoil to make the shooter respect every pull of the trigger.

For a compact suppressed AR-15, the new 73-grain 5.56 load deserves attention. For a suppressed .300 Blackout SBR, the 178-grain load offers an intriguing heavy-supersonic option.

For home defense, the three-inch No. 1 buckshot load provides impressive pattern density—but only for shooters and shotguns capable of controlling it.

The rifle ammunition behaved like a careful engineering project.

The shotgun ammunition behaved like a fistful of angry ball bearings that had recently received professional management.

Both worked.

GarandThumb.com was established on May 4, 2012, to document my experiences trying to become a better marksman.